↓ Skip to main content

Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004851.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Hetrick, Joanne E McKenzie, Georgina R Cox, Magenta B Simmons, Sally N Merry

Abstract

Depressive disorders are common in young people and are associated with significant negative impacts. Newer generation antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are often used, however evidence of their effectiveness in children and adolescents is not clear. Furthermore, there have been warnings against their use in this population due to concerns about increased risk of suicidal ideation and behaviour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 377 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 19%
Student > Master 73 19%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Other 77 20%
Unknown 41 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 41%
Psychology 61 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 59 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#411,969
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#920
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,228
of 127,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.