↓ Skip to main content

A Prospective Study of Dietary Acrylamide Intake and the Risk of Endometrial, Ovarian, and Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Prospective Study of Dietary Acrylamide Intake and the Risk of Endometrial, Ovarian, and Breast Cancer
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, November 2007
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janneke G. Hogervorst, Leo J. Schouten, Erik J. Konings, R. Alexandra Goldbohm, Piet A. van den Brandt

Abstract

Acrylamide, a probable human carcinogen, was detected in various heat-treated carbohydrate-rich foods in 2002. The few epidemiologic studies done thus far have not shown a relationship with cancer. Our aim was to investigate the association between acrylamide intake and endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer risk.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 37 23%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#536,295
of 21,691,316 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#205
of 4,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,673
of 290,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,691,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.