You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stable isotopes in atmospheric water vapor and applications to the hydrologic cycle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews of Geophysics, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2015rg000512 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Galewsky, Hans Christian Steen‐Larsen, Robert D. Field, John Worden, Camille Risi, Matthias Schneider |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 6 | 29% |
| Mexico | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 95% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 330 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 26% |
| Researcher | 56 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 139 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 17% |
| Engineering | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 93 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,521,363
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Geophysics
#154
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,861
of 319,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Geophysics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.