You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deletion of CDKAL1 Affects High-Fat Diet–Induced Fat Accumulation and Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Mice, Indicating Relevance to Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0049055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tadashi Okamura, Rieko Yanobu-Takanashi, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Masato Isono, Koichi Akiyama, Yukiko Shimizu, Motohito Goto, Yi-Qiang Liang, Ken Yamamoto, Tomohiro Katsuya, Akihiro Fujioka, Keizo Ohnaka, Ryoichi Takayanagi, Toshio Ogihara, Yukio Yamori, Norihiro Kato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2012.
All research outputs
#23,381,499
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#204,960
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,301
of 183,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,070
of 4,815 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,815 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.