↓ Skip to main content

Analysis on the situation of subjective well-being and its influencing factors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis on the situation of subjective well-being and its influencing factors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12955-016-0522-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengmeng Wang, Sheng Wang, Xu Zhang, Qing Xia, Guoqi Cai, Xiao Yang, Xiaona Li, Li Wang, Lihong Xin, Shengqian Xu, Jianhua Xu, Zongwen Shuai, Faming Pan

Abstract

To examine the subjective well-being (SWB) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared with the healthy controls, and to explore the associations between SWB and demographic characteristics, disease-specific variables in AS patients. SWB was assessed with General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS) in 200 AS patients and 210 healthy controls. Comparisons among subgroups were performed to investigate how certain aspects operate as favorable or adverse factors in influencing SWB in the patients with AS. Both men and women with AS reported significantly impaired SWB on all scales of the GWBS except for the Control (O) scale. The results revealed that better sleep, lower disease activity and more family care predicted higher SWB. In AS patients, positive attitude towards therapy prospect was significantly associated with higher SWB. Therapy prospect refers to the hope of patients about the disease treatment. Compared with general population, SWB might be affected by the onset of AS. There are significant associations between SWB and sleep quality, BASDAI, APGAR, therapy prospect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,132,504
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#264
of 2,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,197
of 343,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.