You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
InSilico DB genomic datasets hub: an efficient starting point for analyzing genome-wide studies in GenePattern, Integrative Genomics Viewer, and R/Bioconductor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2012-13-11-r104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alain Coletta, Colin Molter, Robin Duqué, David Steenhoff, Jonatan Taminau, Virginie de Schaetzen, Stijn Meganck, Cosmin Lazar, David Venet, Vincent Detours, Ann Nowé, Hugues Bersini, David Y Weiss Solís |
| Abstract |
ABSTRACT: Genomics datasets are increasingly useful for gaining biomedical insights, with adoption in the clinic underway. However, multiple hurdles related to data management stand in the way of their efficient large-scale utilization. The solution proposed is a web-based data storage hub. Having clear focus, flexibility and adaptability, InSilico DB seamlessly connects genomics dataset repositories to state-of-the-art and free GUI and command-line data analysis tools. The InSilico DB platform is a powerful collaborative environment, with advanced capabilities for biocuration, dataset sharing, and dataset subsetting and combination. InSilico DB is available from https://insilicodb.org. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Belgium | 2 | 18% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,298,782
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,004
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,348
of 285,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.