↓ Skip to main content

Using systems thinking to inform management of imperiled species: A case study with sea turtles

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using systems thinking to inform management of imperiled species: A case study with sea turtles
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109201
Authors

Ian Silver-Gorges, Simona A. Ceriani, Matthew Ware, Megan Lamb, Margaret Lamont, Janice Becker, Raymond R. Carthy, Chris Matechik, Joseph Mitchell, Raya Pruner, Mike Reynolds, Bradley Smith, Caitlin Snyder, Mariana M.P.B. Fuentes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,532,072
of 19,206,351 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,700
of 5,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,086
of 339,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#51
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,206,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.