↓ Skip to main content

Atualização de Tópicos Emergentes da Diretriz Brasileira de Insuficiência Cardíaca – 2021

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,079)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atualização de Tópicos Emergentes da Diretriz Brasileira de Insuficiência Cardíaca – 2021
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2021
DOI 10.36660/abc.20210367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiana G. Marcondes-Braga, Lídia Ana Zytynski Moura, Victor Sarli Issa, Jefferson Luis Vieira, Luis Eduardo Rohde, Marcus Vinícius Simões, Miguel Morita Fernandes-Silva, Salvador Rassi, Silvia Marinho Martins Alves, Denilson Campos de Albuquerque, Dirceu Rodrigues de Almeida, Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Felix José Alvarez Ramires, Fernando Bacal, João Manoel Rossi, Luiz Claudio Danzmann, Marcelo Westerlund Montera, Mucio Tavares de Oliveira, Nadine Clausell, Odilson Marcos Silvestre, Reinaldo Bulgarelli Bestetti, Sabrina Bernadez-Pereira, Aguinaldo F. Freitas, Andréia Biolo, Antonio Carlos Pereira Barretto, Antônio José Lagoeiro Jorge, Bruno Biselli, Carlos Eduardo Lucena Montenegro, Edval Gomes dos Santos, Estêvão Lanna Figueiredo, Fábio Fernandes, Fabio Serra Silveira, Fernando Antibas Atik, Flávio de Souza Brito, Germano Emílio Conceição Souza, Gustavo Calado de Aguiar Ribeiro, Humberto Villacorta, João David de Souza, Livia Adams Goldraich, Luís Beck-da-Silva, Manoel Fernandes Canesin, Marcelo Imbroinise Bittencourt, Marcely Gimenes Bonatto, Maria da Consolação Vieira Moreira, Mônica Samuel Avila, Otavio Rizzi Coelho, Pedro Vellosa Schwartzmann, Ricardo Mourilhe-Rocha, Sandrigo Mangini, Silvia Moreira Ayub Ferreira, José Albuquerque de Figueiredo, Evandro Tinoco Mesquita

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Unspecified 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,659,229
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#50
of 1,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,765
of 445,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.