↓ Skip to main content

Receiver operating characteristics of impulse oscillometry parameters for predicting obstructive sleep apnea in preobese and obese snorers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Receiver operating characteristics of impulse oscillometry parameters for predicting obstructive sleep apnea in preobese and obese snorers
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12890-016-0284-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arikin Abdeyrim, Liang Tang, Arzugl Muhamat, Kelimu Abudeyrim, YongPing Zhang, NanFang Li, Yinchun Wang, Minghua Zhao

Abstract

Inability to maintain upper-airway patency during sleep is a cause of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and its sequelae. The associated syndrome (OSAS) is common in obese populations, currently, nocturnal polysomnography is the gold standard for diagnosing this conditions, but the diagnostic procedures are expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, identification of new markers of OSAS would be useful. This study aims to examine the receiver operating characteristics of impulse oscillometry (IOS) parameters for the prediction of OSAS in preobese and obese snoring patients. In total, 230 patients with normal spirometric values were included in this cross-sectional study. Full laboratory polysomnography was performed and IOS measurements were determined in sitting and supine positions to obtain respiratory impedance (Zrs), resistance (Rrs), and reactance (Xrs) parameters. The respiratory resistance at zero-frequency (Rrs0) was extrapolated by linear regression analysis of Rrs versus low-oscillatory-frequencies and its inverse, respiratory conductance (Grs), was calculated. In both the sitting and supine positions Rrs0, Zrs, and Rrs at five oscillatory-frequencies (Hz) and Grs, the reciprocal of Zrs5 (Gz), and Xrs at 5 Hz all had significant positive or negative correlations with OSAS severity as defined by the Respiratory disturbance index (RDI). The correlation coefficients between Rrs0, Zrs5, Rrs5, Grs, Gz, Xrs5 measured in the supine and RDI were 0.425, 0.395, 0.378, -0.425, -0.395, and -0.517, respectively (all p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristics curves showed that Xrs at 5 Hz (reactance) in the supine position was the best for predicting OSAS with a sensitivity of 73 % and specificity of 84 % at the optimal cut-off point of -0.23 (kPa s L(-1)). The other parameters also showed acceptable discriminating power. A logistic-regression model based on respiratory function abnormalities revealed that reactance combined with patient sex and lung volume yielded a specificity of 83.3 % with a sensitivity of 76.8 % for indicating OSAS. Respiratory resistance and reactance measured by IOS are abnormal in preobese and obese OSAS patients, and these parameters are moderate to closely correlated with OSAS severity. IOS might be a useful screening tool for detecting OSAS in clinic based populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 44 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Psychology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 46 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,169,395
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#437
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,195
of 343,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.