You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
End-of-life decisions in neonates and infants: a population-level mortality follow-back study
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, June 2021
Laure Dombrecht, Kim Beernaert, Kenneth Chambaere, Filip Cools, Linde Goossens, Gunnar Naulaers, Joachim Cohen, Luc Deliens
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||22||88%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||12%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||20%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,294,766 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
of 1,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 435,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.