You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genome Sequencing Shows that European Isolates of Francisella tularensis Subspecies tularensis Are Almost Identical to US Laboratory Strain Schu S4
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000352 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roy R. Chaudhuri, Chuan-Peng Ren, Leah Desmond, Gemma A. Vincent, Nigel J. Silman, John K. Brehm, Michael J. Elmore, Michael J. Hudson, Mats Forsman, Karen E. Isherwood, Darina Guryčová, Nigel P. Minton, Richard W. Titball, Mark J. Pallen, Richard Vipond |
Abstract |
Francisella tularensis causes tularaemia, a life-threatening zoonosis, and has potential as a biowarfare agent. F. tularensis subsp. tularensis, which causes the most severe form of tularaemia, is usually confined to North America. However, a handful of isolates from this subspecies was obtained in the 1980s from ticks and mites from Slovakia and Austria. Our aim was to uncover the origins of these enigmatic European isolates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 37% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 49% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2012.
All research outputs
#18,320,524
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,900
of 193,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,232
of 76,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#131
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.