↓ Skip to main content

Engineering and Analyzing Multicellular Systems

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Engineering and Analyzing Multicellular Systems'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Recent progress in engineering human-associated microbiomes.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Constructing synthetic microbial communities to explore the ecology and evolution of symbiosis.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Combining engineering and evolution to create novel metabolic mutualisms between species.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Design, construction, and characterization methodologies for synthetic microbial consortia.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 An Observation Method for Autonomous Signaling-Mediated Synthetic Diversification in Escherichia coli.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Integration-Free Reprogramming of Human Somatic Cells to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) Without Viral Vectors, Recombinant DNA, and Genetic Modification.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Transformation of Bacillus subtilis.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Culturing anaerobes to use as a model system for studying the evolution of syntrophic mutualism.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Therapeutic microbes for infectious disease.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Quantitative measurement and analysis in a synthetic pattern formation multicellular system.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Transcriptome Analysis of a Microbial Coculture in which the Cell Populations Are Separated by a Membrane.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identification of Mutations in Laboratory-Evolved Microbes from Next-Generation Sequencing Data Using breseq.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 3D-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization of Intact, Anaerobic Biofilm.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 The characterization of living bacterial colonies using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Modeling community population dynamics with the open-source language R.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Simulating microbial community patterning using biocellion.
Attention for Chapter 8: Culturing anaerobes to use as a model system for studying the evolution of syntrophic mutualism.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Culturing anaerobes to use as a model system for studying the evolution of syntrophic mutualism.
Chapter number 8
Book title
Engineering and Analyzing Multicellular Systems
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0553-9, 978-1-4939-0554-6
Authors

Lim S, Stolyar S, Hillesland K, Sujung Lim, Sergey Stolyar, Kristina Hillesland, Lim, Sujung, Stolyar, Sergey, Hillesland, Kristina

Editors

Lianhong Sun, Wenying Shou

Abstract

Our current understanding of the evolution of mutualisms is limited partly because there have been relatively few model systems for studying it in real time. A model mutualistic interaction between the bacterium D. vulgaris and the archaeaon M. maripaludis was developed to allow for rigorous tests of general hypotheses about the evolution and ecology of mutualisms. This model system also allows us to develop an evolutionary genetics perspective on an interaction that plays a key ecological role in many oxygen-free microbial communities. Here, we describe the techniques used to make anoxic media for propagating these species alone or in conditions that require their cooperation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 50%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Psychology 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,866
of 13,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,548
of 226,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#97
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.