↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoids in Neurology - Position paper from Scientific Departments from Brazilian Academy of Neurology

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabinoids in Neurology - Position paper from Scientific Departments from Brazilian Academy of Neurology
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2021
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Maria Dozzi BRUCKI, Tarso ADONI, Carlos Mauricio Oliveira ALMEIDA, Daniel Ciampi de ANDRADE, Renato ANGHINAH, Luciana Mendonça BARBOSA, Rodrigo BAZAN, Alzira Alves de Siqueira CARVALHO, William CARVALHO, Paulo Pereira CHRISTO, Marcus Della COLETTA, Adriana Bastos CONFORTO, Ylmar CORREA-NETO, Eliasz ENGELHARDT, Marcondes Cavalcante FRANÇA JUNIOR, Clelia FRANCO, Felipe VON GLEHN, Helio Rodrigues GOMES, Caroline Gomes de Barros HOULY, Alexandre Ottoni KAUP, Fernando KOWACS, Aline KANASHIRO, Victor Gonçalves LOPES, Débora MAIA, Maria MANREZA, Alberto Rolim Muro MARTINEZ, Sandra Cristina Gonçalves MARTINEZ, Saulo Nardy NADER, Luciana de Oliveira NEVES, Ivan Hideyo OKAMOTO, Rogério Adas Ayres de OLIVEIRA, Fabiano de Melo PEIXOTO, Cristiana Borges PEREIRA, Roberta Arb SABA, Leticia Pereira de Brito SAMPAIO, Lucas Porcello SCHILLING, Marcus Tulius Teixeira SILVA, Emanuelle Roberta SILVA, Jerusa SMID, Cristiane Nascimento SOARES, Manoel SOBREIRA-NETO, Nise Alessandra de Carvalho SOUSA, Leonardo Cruz de SOUZA, Hélio Afonso Ghizoni TEIVE, Vera Cristina TERRA, Matheus VALE, Vitor Mendes Grise VIEIRA, Edmar ZANOTELI, Gilmar PRADO

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 15 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Librarian 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 17 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,542,613
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#588
of 1,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,148
of 429,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.