↓ Skip to main content

Contextual and time dependent pain in fibromyalgia: An explorative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contextual and time dependent pain in fibromyalgia: An explorative study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Egil A Fors, Tormod Landmark, Øyvind Bakke

Abstract

Little is known about contextual effects on chronic pain, and how vulnerability factors influence pain in different contexts. We wanted to examine if fibromyalgia (FM) pain varied between two social contexts, i.e. at home versus in a doctor office, when it was measured the same day, and if pain was stable for 14 years when measured in similar contexts (doctor office). Our secondary aim was to explore if pain vulnerability factors varied in the two different contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 23%
Psychology 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,156,397
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,947
of 4,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,631
of 275,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#42
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.