↓ Skip to main content

Aristolochic Acid in the Etiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aristolochic Acid in the Etiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, December 2016
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret L. Hoang, Chung-Hsin Chen, Pau-Chung Chen, Nicholas J. Roberts, Kathleen G. Dickman, Byeong Hwa Yun, Robert J. Turesky, Yeong-Shiau Pu, Bert Vogelstein, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Arthur P. Grollman, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Thomas A. Rosenquist

Abstract

Aristolochia species used in the practice of traditional herbal medicine contain aristolochic acid (AA), an established human carcinogen contributing to urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. AA binds covalently to genomic DNA, forming aristolactam (AL)-DNA adducts. We here investigated whether AA is also an etiologic factor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We conducted a population-based case-control study to investigate the linkage between Aristolochia prescription history, cumulative AA consumption, and ccRCC incidence in Taiwan (5,709 cases and 22,836 matched controls). The presence and level of mutagenic dA-AL-I adducts were determined in the kidney DNA of 51 Taiwanese ccRCC patients. The whole exome sequences of ccRCC tumors from ten Taiwanese ccRCC pateints with prior exposure to AA were determined. Cumulative ingestion of more than 250 milligrams of AA increased risk of ccRCC (OR 1.25) and we detected dA-AL-I adducts in 76% of Taiwanese ccRCC patients. Further, the distinctive AA-mutational signature was evident in six of ten sequenced ccRCC exomes from Taiwanese patients. This study strongly suggests that AA contributes to the etiology of certain renal cell carcinomas. The present study offers compelling evidence implicating AA in a significant fraction of the RCC arising in Taiwan and illustrates the power of integrating epidemiological, molecular and genetic data in the investigation of cancer etiology.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Professor 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Chemistry 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,911,231
of 23,891,012 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1,126
of 4,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,047
of 421,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#17
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,891,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.