↓ Skip to main content

Observations of cocooned Hydrobaenus (Diptera: Chironomidae) larvae in Lake Michigan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Great Lakes Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Observations of cocooned Hydrobaenus (Diptera: Chironomidae) larvae in Lake Michigan
Published in
Journal of Great Lakes Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.013
Authors

Taaja R. Tucker, Patrick L. Hudson, Stephen C. Riley

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 63%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,788
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#1,481
of 1,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,345
of 324,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.