↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Anaemia at Delivery and Haemoglobin Evolution in Children during Their First 18 Months of Life Using Latent Class Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal Anaemia at Delivery and Haemoglobin Evolution in Children during Their First 18 Months of Life Using Latent Class Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kobto G. Koura, Smaïla Ouédraogo, Gilles Cottrell, Agnès Le Port, Achille Massougbodji, André Garcia

Abstract

Anaemia during pregnancy and at delivery is an important public health problem in low- and middle-income countries. Its association with the children's haemoglobin level over time remains unclear. Our goals were to identify distinct haemoglobin level trajectories using latent class analysis and to assess the association between these trajectories and maternal anaemia and other risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Zimbabwe 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 4 4%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#13,372,313
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,502
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,803
of 275,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,257
of 4,682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.