You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Safina Islam, Olivia Joseph, Atiha Chaudry, Davine Forde, Annie Keane, Cassie Wilson, Nasima Begum, Suzanne Parsons, Tracy Grey, Leah Holmes, Bella Starling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 50 | 36% |
| Ireland | 14 | 10% |
| United States | 12 | 9% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 54 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 50% |
| Scientists | 50 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#444,085
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#14
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,002
of 456,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.