↓ Skip to main content

Ribosomal Binding Site Switching: An Effective Strategy for High-Throughput Cloning Constructions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ribosomal Binding Site Switching: An Effective Strategy for High-Throughput Cloning Constructions
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yangbo Hu, Lipeng Feng, Yunlong Li, Yong Zhang, Pei Lu, Simon Rayner, Shiyun Chen

Abstract

Direct cloning of PCR fragments by TA cloning or blunt end ligation are two simple methods which would greatly benefit high-throughput (HTP) cloning constructions if the efficiency can be improved. In this study, we have developed a ribosomal binding site (RBS) switching strategy for direct cloning of PCR fragments. RBS is an A/G rich region upstream of the translational start codon and is essential for gene expression. Change from A/G to T/C in the RBS blocks its activity and thereby abolishes gene expression. Based on this property, we introduced an inactive RBS upstream of a selectable marker gene, and designed a fragment insertion site within this inactive RBS. Forward and reverse insertions of specifically tailed fragments will respectively form an active and inactive RBS, thus all background from vector self-ligation and fragment reverse insertions will be eliminated due to the non-expression of the marker gene. The effectiveness of our strategy for TA cloning and blunt end ligation are confirmed. Application of this strategy to gene over-expression, a bacterial two-hybrid system, a bacterial one-hybrid system, and promoter bank construction are also verified. The advantages of this simple procedure, together with its low cost and high efficiency, makes our strategy extremely useful in HTP cloning constructions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
United States 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,174,175
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,807
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,639
of 275,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,903
of 4,682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.