You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mind the Gap: Upgrading Genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS Long-Read Sequencing Technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047768 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam C. English, Stephen Richards, Yi Han, Min Wang, Vanesa Vee, Jiaxin Qu, Xiang Qin, Donna M. Muzny, Jeffrey G. Reid, Kim C. Worley, Richard A. Gibbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 50% |
| Scientists | 17 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 917 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 22 | 2% |
| Unknown | 840 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 228 | 25% |
| Researcher | 189 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 131 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 43 | 5% |
| Other | 151 | 16% |
| Unknown | 101 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 484 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 165 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 62 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 1% |
| Other | 57 | 6% |
| Unknown | 122 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,110,763
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,167
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,479
of 291,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#244
of 4,739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.