↓ Skip to main content

Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
564 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Hartmann-Boyce J, Cahill K, Lancaster T, Stead, Lindsay F, Perera, Rafael, Bullen, Chris, Mant, David, Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie, Cahill, Kate, Lancaster, Tim, Lindsay F Stead, Rafael Perera, Chris Bullen, David Mant, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Kate Cahill, Tim Lancaster

Abstract

The aim of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is to temporarily replace much of the nicotine from cigarettes to reduce motivation to smoke and nicotine withdrawal symptoms, thus easing the transition from cigarette smoking to complete abstinence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 19%
Student > Master 21 19%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 49%
Unspecified 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Psychology 8 7%
Other 17 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#82,620
of 11,566,755 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 9,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,024
of 308,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 530 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,566,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 530 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.