You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrated Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis Identifies Haplotype-Specific Methylation in the FTO Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity Susceptibility Locus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher G. Bell, Sarah Finer, Cecilia M. Lindgren, Gareth A. Wilson, Vardhman K. Rakyan, Andrew E. Teschendorff, Pelin Akan, Elia Stupka, Thomas A. Down, Inga Prokopenko, Ian M. Morison, Jonathan Mill, Ruth Pidsley, Panos Deloukas, Timothy M. Frayling, Andrew T. Hattersley, Mark I. McCarthy, Stephan Beck, Graham A. Hitman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 253 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 7% |
| Professor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 21% |
| Unknown | 23 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 114 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,501,223
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,511
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,121
of 179,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#128
of 1,025 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,025 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.