↓ Skip to main content

Emerging Infectious Disease Leads to Rapid Population Declines of Common British Birds

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
40 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emerging Infectious Disease Leads to Rapid Population Declines of Common British Birds
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A. Robinson, Becki Lawson, Mike P. Toms, Kirsi M. Peck, James K. Kirkwood, Julian Chantrey, Innes R. Clatworthy, Andy D. Evans, Laura A. Hughes, Oliver C. Hutchinson, Shinto K. John, Tom W. Pennycott, Matthew W. Perkins, Peter S. Rowley, Vic R. Simpson, Kevin M. Tyler, Andrew A. Cunningham

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases are increasingly cited as threats to wildlife, livestock and humans alike. They can threaten geographically isolated or critically endangered wildlife populations; however, relatively few studies have clearly demonstrated the extent to which emerging diseases can impact populations of common wildlife species. Here, we report the impact of an emerging protozoal disease on British populations of greenfinch Carduelis chloris and chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, two of the most common birds in Britain. Morphological and molecular analyses showed this to be due to Trichomonas gallinae. Trichomonosis emerged as a novel fatal disease of finches in Britain in 2005 and rapidly became epidemic within greenfinch, and to a lesser extent chaffinch, populations in 2006. By 2007, breeding populations of greenfinches and chaffinches in the geographic region of highest disease incidence had decreased by 35% and 21% respectively, representing mortality in excess of half a million birds. In contrast, declines were less pronounced or absent in these species in regions where the disease was found in intermediate or low incidence. Also, populations of dunnock Prunella modularis, which similarly feeds in gardens, but in which T. gallinae was rarely recorded, did not decline. This is the first trichomonosis epidemic reported in the scientific literature to negatively impact populations of free-ranging non-columbiform species, and such levels of mortality and decline due to an emerging infectious disease are unprecedented in British wild bird populations. This disease emergence event demonstrates the potential for a protozoan parasite to jump avian host taxonomic groups with dramatic effect over a short time period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 4 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 276 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 18%
Researcher 44 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Student > Master 36 12%
Other 17 6%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 43%
Environmental Science 35 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 31 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 61 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#168,084
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,528
of 223,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#386
of 104,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#14
of 833 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 833 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.