↓ Skip to main content

Trauma and Psychosocial Predictors of Substance Abuse in Women Impacted by HIV/AIDS

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trauma and Psychosocial Predictors of Substance Abuse in Women Impacted by HIV/AIDS
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11414-008-9134-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hector F. Myers, Lekeisha A. Sumner, Jodie B. Ullman, Tamara B. Loeb, Jennifer Vargas Carmona, Gail E. Wyatt

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the relative contributions of trauma, chronic stress burden, depression, anxiety, social support, and social undermining in predicting alcohol and drug abuse, and whether ethnicity moderated these relationships. A multi-ethnic sample of 288 HIV-positive and HIV-negative women was recruited. Multiple group path analysis indicated that greater drug dependence was associated with being HIV+, more depression, and higher chronic burden. Trauma was related only to anxiety. Also, greater alcohol dependence was associated with more depression and more social undermining, and these effects were moderated by ethnicity. African American and Latina women evidenced different relationships between depression, social support and social undermining. Depression, social support and social undermining served as intervening variables in influencing the relationships between the other psychosocial variables and drug and alcohol dependence. The implications of these findings for alcohol and drug abuse research and services are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 22%
Social Sciences 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,425,063
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#421
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,634
of 96,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.