↓ Skip to main content

Latin American Consensus on management of residual cardiometabolic risk. A consensus paper prepared by the Latin American Academy for the Study of Lipids and Cardiometabolic Risk (ALALIP) endorsed by…

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos de cardiología de México, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 241)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Latin American Consensus on management of residual cardiometabolic risk. A consensus paper prepared by the Latin American Academy for the Study of Lipids and Cardiometabolic Risk (ALALIP) endorsed by the Inter-American Society of Cardiology (IASC), the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS), and the Pan-American College of Endothelium (PACE)
Published in
Archivos de cardiología de México, November 2021
DOI 10.24875/acm.21000005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos I. Ponte-Negretti, Fernando S. Wyss, Daniel Piskorz, Raul D Santos, Raul Villar, Alberto Lorenzatti, Patricio López-Jaramillo, Peter P. Toth, A. Juan J. Amaro, Alfonso K. Rodrigo, Fernando Lanas, Miguel Urina-Triana, Jofre Lara, T. Osiris Valdés, José R. Gomez-Mancebo, Alfonso Bryce, Leonardo Cobos S., Adriana Puente-Barragan, Vladimir E. Ullauri-Solórzano, Felix A. Medina-Palomino, Alfredo F. Lozada, Maritza Duran, Percy Berrospi, David Miranda, Juan J. Badimon, J. José R. González, Peter Libby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 6 10%
Other 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,126,281
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#11
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,467
of 516,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.