↓ Skip to main content

Latin American Consensus on management of residual cardiometabolic risk. A consensus paper prepared by the Latin American Academy for the Study of Lipids and Cardiometabolic Risk (ALALIP) endorsed by…

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos de cardiología de México, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 175)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Latin American Consensus on management of residual cardiometabolic risk. A consensus paper prepared by the Latin American Academy for the Study of Lipids and Cardiometabolic Risk (ALALIP) endorsed by the Inter-American Society of Cardiology (IASC), the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS), and the Pan-American College of Endothelium (PACE)
Published in
Archivos de cardiología de México, November 2021
DOI 10.24875/acm.21000005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos I. Ponte-Negretti, Fernando Wyss, Daniel Piskorz, Raul D. Santos, Raul Villar, Alberto Lorenzatti, Patricio López-Jaramillo, Peter P. Toth, A. Juan J. Amaro, Alfonso K. Rodrigo, Fernando Lanas, Miguel Urina-Triana, Jofre Lara, T. Osiris Valdés, José R. Gomez-Mancebo, Alfonso Bryce, Leonardo Cobos S., Adriana Puente-Barragán, Vladimir E. Ullauri-Solórzano, Félix A. Medina-Palomino, Alfredo F. Lozada, Maritza Duran, Percy Berrospi, David Miranda, Juan J. Badimon, J. José R. González, Peter Libby

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 13%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 17 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,651,181
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#7
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,340
of 510,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.