You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk, Trust, and Flawed Assumptions: Vaccine Hesitancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.700213 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Omid V. Ebrahimi, Miriam S. Johnson, Sara Ebling, Ole Myklebust Amundsen, Øyvind Halsøy, Asle Hoffart, Nora Skjerdingstad, Sverre Urnes Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 67% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
Researcher | 10 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 15% |
Unknown | 91 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
Psychology | 14 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 14% |
Unknown | 91 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,286,194
of 23,466,057 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#908
of 11,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,525
of 443,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#61
of 623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,466,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.