↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of Global Non-Motor Symptoms Burden Progression in Parkinson’s Disease. Results from the COPPADIS Cohort at 2-Year Follow-Up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Personalized Medicine, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of Global Non-Motor Symptoms Burden Progression in Parkinson’s Disease. Results from the COPPADIS Cohort at 2-Year Follow-Up
Published in
Journal of Personalized Medicine, June 2021
DOI 10.3390/jpm11070626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Santos-García, Teresa de Deus, Carlos Cores, Hector Canfield, Jose Paz González, Cristina Martínez Miró, Lorena Valdés Aymerich, Ester Suárez, Silvia Jesús, Miquel Aguilar, Pau Pastor, Lluis Planellas, Marina Cosgaya, Juan García Caldentey, Nuria Caballol, Ines Legarda, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Iria Cabo, Lydia López Manzanares, Isabel González Aramburu, Maria Ávila Rivera, Maria Catalán, Victor Nogueira, Victor Puente, Julio Dotor, Carmen Borrué, Berta Solano, Maria Álvarez Sauco, Lydia Vela, Sonia Escalante, Esther Cubo, Francisco Carrillo, Juan Martínez Castrillo, Pilar Sánchez Alonso, Gemma Alonso, Nuria López Ariztegui, Itziar Gastón, Jaime Kulisevsky, Marta Blázquez, Manuel Seijo, Javier Rúiz Martínez, Caridad Valero, Monica Kurtis, Oriol de Fábregues, Jessica Ardura, Ruben Alonso, Carlos Ordás, Luis López Díaz, Darrian McAfee, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Pablo Mir

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,219,563
of 19,338,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personalized Medicine
#84
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,689
of 337,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personalized Medicine
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,338,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.