↓ Skip to main content

学会抄録(青森地方会第376回例会,秋田地方会第376回例会,宮城地方会第376回例会,福島地方会第376回例会,東京地方会第869回例会(四地区分会),山口地方会第170回~第171回例会)

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 166)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
学会抄録(青森地方会第376回例会,秋田地方会第376回例会,宮城地方会第376回例会,福島地方会第376回例会,東京地方会第869回例会(四地区分会),山口地方会第170回~第171回例会)
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, January 2017
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.127.41

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,393,995
of 20,457,135 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#28
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,483
of 339,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,457,135 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them