↓ Skip to main content

Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 8,762)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
272 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
517 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
913 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edin Smailhodzic, Wyanda Hooijsma, Albert Boonstra, David J. Langley

Abstract

Since the emergence of social media in 2004, a growing percentage of patients use this technology for health related reasons. To reflect on the alleged beneficial and potentially harmful effects of social media use by patients, the aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the extant literature on the effects of social media use for health related reasons on patients and their relationship with healthcare professionals. We conducted a systematic literature review on empirical research regarding the effects of social media use by patients for health related reasons. The papers we included met the following selection criteria: (1) published in a peer-reviewed journal, (2) written in English, (3) full text available to the researcher, (4) contain primary empirical data, (5) the users of social media are patients, (6) the effects of patients using social media are clearly stated, (7) satisfy established quality criteria. Initially, a total of 1,743 articles were identified from which 22 were included in the study. From these articles six categories of patients' use of social media were identified, namely: emotional, information, esteem, network support, social comparison and emotional expression. The types of use were found to lead to seven identified types of effects on patients, namely improved self-management and control, enhanced psychological well-being, and enhanced subjective well-being, diminished subjective well-being, addiction to social media, loss of privacy, and being targeted for promotion. Social media use by patients was found to affect the healthcare professional and patient relationship, by leading to more equal communication between the patient and healthcare professional, increased switching of doctors, harmonious relationships, and suboptimal interaction between the patient and healthcare professional. Our review provides insights into the emerging utilization of social media in healthcare. In particular, it identifies types of use by patients as well as the effects of such use, which may differ between patients and doctors. Accordingly, our results framework and propositions can serve to guide future research, and they also have practical implications for healthcare providers and policy makers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 272 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 913 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 909 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 11%
Student > Master 97 11%
Student > Bachelor 97 11%
Researcher 65 7%
Other 43 5%
Other 171 19%
Unknown 337 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 176 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 10%
Social Sciences 65 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 53 6%
Computer Science 50 5%
Other 132 14%
Unknown 350 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#199,804
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#29
of 8,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,851
of 351,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.