↓ Skip to main content

Independent and Incremental Role of Quantitative Right Ventricular Evaluation for the Prediction of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Independent and Incremental Role of Quantitative Right Ventricular Evaluation for the Prediction of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Published in
JACC, August 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D.M. Grant, Nicholas G. Smedira, Randall C. Starling, Thomas H. Marwick

Abstract

This study sought to determine the utility of quantitation of right ventricular (RV) function in predicting RV failure in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 23%
Other 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Master 10 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 58%
Engineering 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 49 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#14,120
of 16,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,006
of 179,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#81
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.