You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scientific Images as Circulating Ideas: An Application of Ludwik Fleck’s Theory of Thought Styles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for General Philosophy of Science, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10838-016-9327-y |
| Authors |
Nicola Mößner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,338,537
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#164
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,161
of 400,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for General Philosophy of Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.