↓ Skip to main content

Maintenance treatments for opiate dependent adolescent

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maintenance treatments for opiate dependent adolescent
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007210.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minozzi S, Amato L, Davoli M, Minozzi, Silvia, Amato, Laura, Davoli, Marina

Abstract

The scientific literature examining effective treatments for opioid dependent adults clearly indicates that pharmacotherapy is a necessary and acceptable component of effective treatments for opioid dependence. Nevertheless no studies have been published which systematically assess the effectiveness of the pharmacological maintenance treatment among adolescent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Unspecified 4 11%
Other 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 37%
Unspecified 6 16%
Psychology 5 13%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#3,474,677
of 13,378,007 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,331
of 10,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,756
of 247,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#330
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,378,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.