You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biodiversidade e uso de hábitat da anurofauna em Santa Fé do Sul, região noroeste do estado de São Paulo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1676-06032005000300031 |
| Authors |
Tiago Gomes dos Santos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 19% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 22% |
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 89% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,486
of 153,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.