↓ Skip to main content

Caracterização morfológica de ecótipos de arroz daninho (Oryza sativa) provenientes de áreas de arroz irrigado

Overview of attention for article published in Planta Daninha, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caracterização morfológica de ecótipos de arroz daninho (Oryza sativa) provenientes de áreas de arroz irrigado
Published in
Planta Daninha, June 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0100-83582008000200001
Authors

A.M.L. Schwanke, J.A. Noldin, A. Andres, S.O. Procópio, G. Concenço

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,916,313
of 18,129,145 outputs
Outputs from Planta Daninha
#4
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,508
of 176,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta Daninha
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,129,145 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 46 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them