↓ Skip to main content

Stingless bees and mass flowering trees in the canopy of Atlantic Forest: a tight relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Botanica Brasilica, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 380)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stingless bees and mass flowering trees in the canopy of Atlantic Forest: a tight relationship
Published in
Acta Botanica Brasilica, July 2004
DOI 10.1590/s0102-33062004000100005
Authors

Mauro Ramalho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#44
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,159
of 59,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them