You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sub-diffraction Limit Localization of Proteins in Volumetric Space Using Bayesian Restoration of Fluorescence Images from Ultrathin Specimens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002671 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon Wang, Stephen J. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 41% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,151
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,792
of 187,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#33
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.