↓ Skip to main content

A focused protection vaccination strategy: why we should not target children with COVID-19 vaccination policies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 3,344)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
459 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A focused protection vaccination strategy: why we should not target children with COVID-19 vaccination policies
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2021
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2021-107700
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Giubilini, Sunetra Gupta, Carl Heneghan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 459 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Professor 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 10 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#65,056
of 21,817,553 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#20
of 3,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,050
of 341,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,817,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.