You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
JHET INTERVIEWS: KAREN VAUGHN
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1053837221000213 |
| Authors |
Bruce Caldwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Georgia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 71% |
| Scientists | 10 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,678,081
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#14
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,004
of 450,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.