↓ Skip to main content

An RCT protocol of varying financial incentive amounts for smoking cessation among pregnant women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An RCT protocol of varying financial incentive amounts for smoking cessation among pregnant women
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marita Lynagh, Billie Bonevski, Rob Sanson-Fisher, Ian Symonds, Anthony Scott, Alix Hall, Christopher Oldmeadow

Abstract

Smoking during pregnancy is harmful to the unborn child. Few smoking cessation interventions have been successfully incorporated into standard antenatal care. The main aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of a personal financial incentive scheme for encouraging smoking cessation among pregnant women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 28%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,141,290
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,660
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,712
of 259,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#657
of 1,057 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,057 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.