You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Life cycle assessment of edible insects (Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis larvae) as a future protein and fat source
Scientific Reports, July 2021
Amin Nikkhah, Sam Van Haute, Vesna Jovanovic, Heejung Jung, Jo Dewulf, Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic, Sami Ghnimi
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||60%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||12||13%|
|Student > Master||11||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||15||16%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,978,283 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
of 129,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 442,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
of 4,355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.