You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003879.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hossein Ghaeminia, John Perry, Marloes EL Nienhuijs, Verena Toedtling, Marcia Tummers, Theo JM Hoppenreijs, Wil JM Van der Sanden, Theodorus G Mettes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 28% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Chile | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 30% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 354 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 63 | 18% |
| Unknown | 105 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 172 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 119 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#138,725
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#246
of 13,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,808
of 349,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.