You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mid-Upper Arm Circumference Based Nutrition Programming: Evidence for a New Approach in Regions with High Burden of Acute Malnutrition
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0049320 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sylvie Goossens, Yodit Bekele, Oliver Yun, Géza Harczi, Marie Ouannes, Susan Shepherd |
Abstract |
In therapeutic feeding programs (TFP), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) shows advantages over weight-for-height Z score (WHZ) and is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an independent criterion for screening children 6-59 months old. Here we report outcomes and treatment response from a TFP using MUAC ≤118 mm or oedema as sole admission criteria for severe acute malnutrition (SAM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Senegal | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 41 | 23% |
Researcher | 24 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 16% |
Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,249,316
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,742
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,559
of 276,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#574
of 4,677 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,677 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.