↓ Skip to main content

Mid-Upper Arm Circumference Based Nutrition Programming: Evidence for a New Approach in Regions with High Burden of Acute Malnutrition

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mid-Upper Arm Circumference Based Nutrition Programming: Evidence for a New Approach in Regions with High Burden of Acute Malnutrition
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvie Goossens, Yodit Bekele, Oliver Yun, Géza Harczi, Marie Ouannes, Susan Shepherd

Abstract

In therapeutic feeding programs (TFP), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) shows advantages over weight-for-height Z score (WHZ) and is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an independent criterion for screening children 6-59 months old. Here we report outcomes and treatment response from a TFP using MUAC ≤118 mm or oedema as sole admission criteria for severe acute malnutrition (SAM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 173 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 23%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,249,316
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,742
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,559
of 276,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#574
of 4,677 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,677 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.