↓ Skip to main content

A comparative baseline of coral disease in three regions along the Saudi Arabian coast of the central Red Sea

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative baseline of coral disease in three regions along the Saudi Arabian coast of the central Red Sea
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246854
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greta Smith Aeby, Amanda Shore, Thor Jensen, Maren Ziegler, Thierry Work, Christian R. Voolstra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Environmental Science 7 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,226,402
of 21,592,309 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#60,268
of 184,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,159
of 337,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#144
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,592,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.