You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reptiles as food: predation of Australian reptiles by introduced red foxes compounds and complements predation by cats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Wildlife Research, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1071/wr20194 |
Authors |
Alyson M. Stobo-Wilson, Brett P. Murphy, Sarah M. Legge, David G. Chapple, Heather M. Crawford, Stuart J. Dawson, Chris R. Dickman, Tim S. Doherty, Patricia A. Fleming, Matthew Gentle, Thomas M. Newsome, Russell Palmer, Matthew W. Rees, Euan G. Ritchie, James Speed, John-Michael Stuart, Eilysh Thompson, Jeff Turpin, John C. Z. Woinarski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 15 | 48% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Saint Lucia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
Scientists | 7 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#530,664
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#39
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,911
of 446,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.