You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional MRI To Evaluate “Sense of Self” following Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0049883 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie A. Caterson, Sharon E. Fox, Adam M. Tobias, Bernard T. Lee |
| Abstract |
Breast reconstruction is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction. Previous patient satisfaction studies have been subjective. This study utilizes functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to objectively evaluate "sense of self" following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction in an attempt to better understand patient perception. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 40% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Estonia | 1 | 5% |
| Czechia | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Hungary | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 35% |
| Psychology | 8 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,044,897
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,106
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,223
of 277,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#523
of 4,740 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,740 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.