↓ Skip to main content

“Para a alma,

Overview of attention for article published in Varia Historia, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 311)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Para a alma, & para o corpo he a gula o mais mortal peccado”: Discursos religiosos e médicos sobre os entendimentos e os efeitos do consumo alimentar exagerado, Portugal, século XVIII
Published in
Varia Historia, August 2021
DOI 10.1590/0104-87752021000200008
Authors

Eliane Cristina FLECK, Mauro DILLMANN

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,847,015
of 18,707,006 outputs
Outputs from Varia Historia
#8
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,709
of 306,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Varia Historia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,707,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them