You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Let’s talk about medication: concordance in rating medication adherence among multimorbid patients and their general practitioners
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s35498 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dominik Ose, Cornelia Mahler, Ines Vogel, Sabine Ludt, Joachim Szecsenyi, Tobias Freund |
Abstract |
Medication adherence can be essential for improving health outcomes. Patients with multiple chronic conditions, often receiving multiple medications, are at higher risk for medication nonadherence. Previous research has focused on concordance between patients and providers about which medication should be taken. However, the question of whether patients and providers are concordant in rating actual medication intake has not been answered as yet. This study aimed to explore the extent and predictors of patient - provider concordance in rating medication adherence in patients with multiple chronic conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,031,938
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,003
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,804
of 203,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.