You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interactions between Affective and Cognitive Processing Systems in Problematic Gamblers: A Functional Connectivity Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0049923 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth J. van Holst, Johan N. van der Meer, Donald G. McLaren, Wim van den Brink, Dick J. Veltman, Anna E. Goudriaan |
| Abstract |
Motivational and cognitive abnormalities are frequently reported in pathological gambling. However, studies simultaneously investigating motivational and cognitive processing in problematic gamblers are lacking, limiting our understanding of the interplay between these systems in problematic gambling. Studies in non-clinical samples indicate that interactions between dorsal "executive" and ventral "affective" processing systems are necessary for adequate responses in various emotive situations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 28% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,671,894
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,345
of 193,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,348
of 277,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,230
of 4,740 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,740 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.