You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impaired macrophage phagocytosis in non‐eosinophilic asthma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.04075.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. L. Simpson, P. G. Gibson, I. A. Yang, J. Upham, A. James, P. N. Reynolds, S. Hodge, AMAZES Study Research Group |
Abstract |
Many patients with non-eosinophilic asthma have increased numbers of neutrophils in the airways. The explanation for this chronic inflammation remains unclear, but may result from an impaired ability of alveolar macrophages to phagocytose apoptotic cells (a process termed 'efferocytosis'), as we have shown in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
Argentina | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Germany | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,509,418
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#1,535
of 3,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,495
of 292,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#19
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.