You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Low level laser therapy for nonspecific low‐back pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005107.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Reza Yousefi‐Nooraie, Eva Schonstein, Kazem Heidari, Arash Rashidian, Victoria Pennick, Marjan Akbari‐Kamrani, Shirin Irani, Behnam Shakiba, Sara Mortaz Hejri, Ahmad‐Reza Jonaidi, Soroush Mortaz‐Hedjri |
Abstract |
Low-back pain (LBP) is a major health problem and a major cause of medical expenses and disablement. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) can be used to treat musculoskeletal disorders such as back pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 320 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
Researcher | 37 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 7% |
Other | 76 | 23% |
Unknown | 76 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Psychology | 9 | 3% |
Other | 51 | 16% |
Unknown | 91 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,931,471
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,140
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,793
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.